At the time of writing, 130 clinicians have been involved in the project by participating in interviews, workshops, or testing prototypes. As we follow the human-centered design cycle, we involve clinicians in every step to review, guide, and test our work. This feedback continuously guides the design and development of the system to ensure that the functionality aligns with clinical needs. When performing research and defining problems with AI that we need to overcome, interviews and workshops with clinicians guide our understanding of how shortcomings in AI systems (e.g., an AI that does not explain or visualize its logic) might influence clinical use. When designing the VA, clinicians may critique our work or even participate in co-design workshops where they have more control over designing the behavior of the VA. During development and evaluation, large groups of clinicians get access to early prototypes of the VA to test it, provide feedback, and share data about its user experience (UX). Finally, once we analyze data from all these activities, we come to clinicians with our conclusions to discuss future steps. Moreover, all of these user activities provide data that we use to train our VA to better understand clinicians’ requests and create new responses.